A portfolio entry built with Cursor has one job: convince someone scanning a list of projects that this one is worth a closer look. That person is usually a hiring manager, a technical lead running a take home review, or a prospective client comparing a few freelancers. None of them will clone the repository before deciding whether to keep reading. They will look at whatever sits next to the project title, and a static screenshot of a form or a dashboard tells them almost nothing about whether the thing actually works.
Cursor itself is a code editor, not a hosting platform. It does not publish a project to a public URL or keep a preview running on its own. Whatever the developer builds runs locally during the work, on a dev server reachable at a local address, and gets deployed afterward to whichever host the developer picked, if they deployed it at all. That gap between "the code exists" and "the app is reachable" is exactly where a portfolio entry can fail even when the underlying work is solid. A video sidesteps the gap. It captures the app in its current reachable state, whether that state is a deployed URL or a local dev server, and turns it into something a reviewer can watch without running anything themselves.
