A Bolt built project raises a specific doubt for anyone reviewing a portfolio: was this actually built, or did a prompt just produce something that looks finished in a screenshot. That doubt is fair, since a static image of a generated interface says nothing about whether the underlying app actually functions. A portfolio video answers the doubt directly by showing the app doing something, which a generation process alone cannot fake.
The fix starts with where the video points. A Bolt project typically runs first inside a sandboxed in-browser session while it is being built, and that session is not the same as a deployed, publicly reachable app. A portfolio entry meant to sit online for months benefits from the more durable option: an actual deploy, most often to a hosting target that hands back a stable public address once the deploy finishes. Recording against the temporary session risks a portfolio entry that stops resolving once the builder moves on to the next project.
This is a different failure mode than a broken video file, and it is easy to miss because nothing about the finished video looks wrong at the time it is published. The video plays fine, the link in the caption looks reasonable, and only much later does a visitor discover that clicking through leads nowhere. A portfolio is meant to be revisited over a long period, sometimes years after the entry was written, so it is worth the small extra step of confirming the deploy before considering the entry finished.
